<p>These question are based on selected poems from Ker, D.et al (eds.)New poetry from Africa; Soyinka, (ed.): Poems of Black Africa; Senanu K.E. and Vincent, T.(eds.): A Selection of African poetry;Umukoro, M et al (eds.): Exam focus:Literature in English: Eruvbetine, A.E.et al (eds): Longman Examination Guide and Nwoga, D.I. (eds.): West African Verse.<br> <br> The predominant device in Launko's End of war is</p>

Question 185 of 327

These question are based on selected poems from Ker, D.et al (eds.)New poetry from Africa; Soyinka, (ed.): Poems of Black Africa; Senanu K.E. and Vincent, T.(eds.): A Selection of African poetry;Umukoro, M et al (eds.): Exam focus:Literature in English: Eruvbetine, A.E.et al (eds): Longman Examination Guide and Nwoga, D.I. (eds.): West African Verse.

The predominant device in Launko's End of war is

A. antithesis
B. oxymoron
C. paradox
D. onomatopoeia

Correct Answer: C

Explanation

The correct option for the predominant device in Launko's "End of War" is C. paradox. Explanation of the Correct Answer

Understanding Paradox: A paradox is a statement that seems contradictory or illogical at first glance but may reveal a deeper truth upon closer examination. In literature, paradoxes often highlight complex themes or emotions, making readers think critically about the underlying message.
Context of "End of War": In Launko's poem, the title itself suggests a conclusion to conflict, yet the content may explore the lingering effects of war, such as trauma, loss, and the idea that peace is not simply the absence of war. This duality can create a paradox where the end of war does not equate to the end of suffering or conflict within individuals or societies.
Examples in the Poem: If the poem discusses themes like the futility of war or the idea that peace can be as painful as war, these elements would exemplify a paradox. For instance, a line might suggest that "the silence after the battle is deafening," which juxtaposes the idea of silence (often associated with peace) with the overwhelming emotional noise of grief and trauma.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

A. Antithesis: Antithesis involves contrasting ideas presented in a balanced way, often using parallel structure. While "End of War" may contain contrasting themes, the primary focus is on the complexity of the situation rather than a straightforward opposition. Antithesis would be more about clear, opposing ideas rather than the nuanced contradictions found in a paradox.
B. Oxymoron: An oxymoron is a figure of speech that combines contradictory terms, such as "bittersweet" or "deafening silence." While oxymorons can appear in the poem, they are not the predominant device. A paradox encompasses a broader range of contradictions and deeper meanings than a simple juxtaposition of two opposing words.
D. Onomatopoeia: Onomatopoeia refers to words that imitate sounds, like "buzz" or "bang." While sound devices can enhance the poem's emotional impact, they do not capture the thematic complexity that a paradox does. The focus of "End of War" is more on the exploration of themes rather than the auditory effects of language.

Summary of Key Points

Paradox is the correct answer because it captures the complex and often contradictory nature of themes in "End of War."
The poem likely explores the idea that the end of war does not equate to the end of suffering, revealing deeper truths about human experience.
Other options like antithesis, oxymoron, and onomatopoeia do not adequately represent the predominant literary device used in the poem.
Understanding these devices helps in analyzing and appreciating the depth of literary works, especially in poetry that deals with heavy themes like war and peace.

This thorough understanding of the predominant device will aid in your analysis of similar poems and enhance your overall comprehension of literary techniques in English literature.